Tamiflu: Our first-line drug against the flu is an epic-fail

By Dr. Ronald Hoffman


In the wake of last week's newsletter article in which I questioned the flu vaccine, I was disheartened by a subsequent commentary in Medscape entitled "Are 'Vaccine Skeptics' Responsible for Flu Deaths?"

The tagline was "Some experts say anti-vaccine lobby took over messaging about flu vaccine". I'm not a member of any "lobby" and would be delighted to report that the flu vaccine works and has no downsides. Some of these "experts" believe the public is so gullible and medically illiterate that they can't handle the truth. I guess they think that the facts about the vaccine's poor performance need to be better "managed" through more effective media campaigns. They claim that antivaxxers are responsible for the needless deaths of many unvaccinated people.

At the risk of being labeled a baby-killer, I can't stay silent about the marginally effective-and side effect-ridden-antiviral drug Tamiflu. As with the vaccine, its promoters are losing the messaging war, too. Notwithstanding misleading headlines like "38-Year-Old Teacher Died After Not Getting Flu Meds Due To High Price, Husband Says", the drug's ability to prevent death or even serious flu complications is questionable, as we'll soon see. A random survey of headlines about Tamiflu is overwhelmingly negative:

"Mounting Tamiflu terrors: Girl, 11 saw 'the portal to HELL' and had to be hospitalized for three months after she was treated for the flu" -Daily Mail, UK

"My kid nearly jumped out of window while tripping on Tamiflu" - New York Post

"Father warning other parents about scary side effects of Tamiflu" - FOX59

"Parents warn their children are having hallucinations, threatening suicide while taking Tamiflu" - TheIndyChannel.com Indianapolis

Paradoxically, there's been a run on Tamiflu, according to GoodRx.com:

"In what appears to be the worst flu epidemic in years, prescriptions for Tamiflu are soaring - outpacing last year's prescriptions by a factor of 10 or even 14 times higher this year in some states, with a nationwide rate that is more than 5 times higher than last year."

Shortages are appearing in some areas, and hospitals are having trouble stockpiling enough for critically-ill patients. Patients and their doctor enablers are swallowing the premise that Tamiflu, if taken early enough in the course of a flu (within 48 hours of onset of symptoms), will shorten or lessen the severity of the flu, even reduce the risk of hospitalization or death.

As did all New York physicians, I received the following urgent electronic advisory from the New York State Department of Health: "Antiviral treatment is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who are hospitalized, seriously ill, or at high risk of serious influenza-related complications." But is there evidence that those claims are justified?

Tamiflu has been a controversial drug almost from the time of its introduction nearly 2 decades ago. In a 2017 editorial entitled "Evidence of the Minimal Benefit of Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is Now 18 Years Old", the British Medical Journal applauded the decision of the World Health Organization (WHO) to downgrade its recommendation of Tamiflu. WHO stated: "The original US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved professional product label indicated only a modest clinical benefit for the drug in reducing the duration of flu symptoms, a little more than a day." Moreover "[Tamiflu's] professional product label was amended in 2000 to reflect that there was no evidence that the drug would prevent the complications of influenza." The marketing authorization for Tamiflu contained no information that it would reduce serious sequelae of the flu, secondary bacterial infections like pneumonia, bronchitis, sinusitis or otitis media.

Moreover, much has been written about Roche's withholding of trial data on Tamiflu's efficacy, which some consumer advocates have called out as a virtual case study of BigPharma deception.

After exhaustive study of numerous research trials-many of which were plagued with drug company sponsor bias-the authoritative Cochrane Collaborative concluded that Tamiflu could not be demonstrated to reduce flu symptoms by more than a day; there was no significant impact on the rate of hospitalization. There wasn't enough data to determine whether it could reduce the flu death rate-hence the disingenuousness of the headline that said a woman died because she couldn't afford the drug. Finally, there is no evidence that it can help curtail the spread of the flu.

Nevertheless, in the wake of pandemic scares like that of 2009, governments were stampeded into stockpiling tens of millions of doses of Tamiflu, delivering a sales bonanza to Roche.

As to side effects, they're well-acknowledged. Roche initially whitewashed these, as it reported in one early trial: "There were no drug-related serious adverse events." But reports of nausea, vomiting and psychiatric events soon emerged. Statistics are a little hard to visualize, but one expert estimated:

"If a million people take Tamiflu in a pandemic, 45,000 will experience vomiting, 31,000 will experience headache and 11,000 will have psychiatric side-effects. Remember, though, that those figures all assume we are only giving Tamiflu to a million people: if things kick off, we have stockpiled enough for 80% of the population. That's quite a lot of vomit."

How's that for an apocalyptic scenario?

Bottom line: We're placing too much reliance on a drug with marginal benefits and well-documented side effects. Even if you manage to score some from your doctor within the 48-hour critical period after the first onset of symptoms during which it may have slight efficacy-a dubious proposition given how cumbersome it can be to get prescriptions these days-is it worth the side effects? Would you give it to your young child who is inherently less resilient to its mind-bending effects? Did Tamiflu turn out to be a lifesaver for the scores of patients who succumbed to the flu this season, undoubtedly after being dosed, as a last resort, with intravenous Tamiflu?

We can and must do better. Meanwhile, deceptive messaging that suppresses the truth about Tamiflu does not advance the cause of public health. We mustn't heed those who want to double-down on an epic-fail.

ADDENDUM: As of publication, Japanese health authorities have just announced approval of a "one-day" antiflu drug-Xofluza. Sounds promising, but let's keep our powder dry while awaiting post-marketing studies evaluating its effectiveness and side effects.


I want to let all my readers know that I've heard your requests for focused advice on immune-bolstering supplementation loud and clear. In response, I've created the Intelligent Medicine Seasonal Immune Support Protocol - a curated list of my top recommendations for helping you keep your immune system in its best shape during this trying time of year. These are the same supplements I recommend to my patients and use myself. You can check out the protocol on my website.

Have a comment on this article? Send it.


 

Back to...

Health conditions and concerns

More in this group...

Page  1 2

Anti-aging medicine

Reflections on "health"

Growing older and memory

12 drugs you should never take (part 2 of 3)

13 reasons why most health studies are wrong

13 tests your doctor is not likely to offer, but you should ask for anyway

14 supplements you should NEVER take - updated! (part one)

9 things your doctor doesn't know about supplements (but definitely should)

Want to live longer? Here's how!

What's your Health IQ? Take this test to find out!

"Don't take your vitamins"? So not!

"Don't take your vitamins?" so not!

Intelligent Medicine Bone Health Protocol available now!

Intelligent Medicine Health News Review

Intelligent Medicine Shorts:

10 epic medical fails: Bet most of you have fallen for at least one! (Part one)

10 responses to supplement naysayers

10 things I got right 30 years ago

10 ways the foods you eat can affect your sex life

11 ways you can predict how long you'll live

12 drugs you should never take (part 1 of 3)

12 drugs you should never take (part 3 of 3)

12 supplements you should NEVER take

13 holiday survival tips

13 tips for surviving the holidays (part one)

13 tips for surviving the holidays (part two)

13 tips for surviving the holidays: Part One

13 tips for surviving the holidays: Part two

14 supplements you should NEVER take - updated! (part two)

14 things YOU know better than your doctor

14 things YOU know better than your doctor

17 nutraceuticals that can boost your immune response

18 supplements that may stave off Alzheimer's

21 ways to save your liver!

24 ways we should fundamentally transform our healthcare system

28 things to be thankful for this Thanksgiving

6 new products that I'm excited about in 2015

8 reasons why the FDA's recent ban on anti-bacterial cleansers is a good idea

A year-end message from Intelligent Medicine

American Heart Association doubles down on outmoded saturated fat recommendations

Are some medicines stealing your brain power?

Beating the winter blahs

Book review: "the story of the human body", by Daniel E. Lieberman, Ph.D.

Can a low-salt diet actually be BAD for you?

Chill out--it may be healthy for you!

Click bait health reporting: I'm calling BS on these 5 health stories

Clinical Focus: Nicotinamide Riboside

Cold, painful fingertips? Try these remedies!

Could a vegetarian diet undermine your mental health?

Debating a skeptic

Debunking the top 7 supplement myths

Defensive Eating: Taming your addiction to food

Detox in a box

Diversify your exercise portfolio

Do you have "poor protoplasm"?

Do you have WWS (Work Withdrawal Syndrome)?

Does this plug-in make me look fat? and does it matter anyway?

Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez: In Memoriam

Exercise that I do

Five health victories we've already won

Four more drugs you should avoid

From wraith to warrior: Hoffman Center's Grimaldy Vargas triumphs in her first Spartan Sprint race!

Frontline gets it wrong about supplements

GMOs: a primer

Happy Fourth of July! Plan a health revolution, and what's in store for Intelligent Medicine

Happy one millionth podcast! Let's review the best of 2015 so far

How to protect yourself from the harmful effects of antibiotics

ICYMI: Dr. Hoffman's Store now available through Fullscript!

Innovative therapies for Multiple Sclerosis

Intravenous vitamin c validated by new studies

Iron: Do you want to hear the good news or the bad news first?

Is the way to a (wo)man's heart through his(her) stomach?

Is there really a vast conspiracy to deprive us of cures and profit off our misery?

Is your BBQ killing you? Your personal anti-AGEing program

Is your Coumadin killing you? (The remarkable potential of vitamin K to stop arterial calcification)

Is your doctor a psychopath?

Jurassic World: A parable

Listen to your gut: What your microbiome can tell you about your overall health

Medical evolution will affect you, but how?

Michele Obama's water advocacy based on 'murky' science, say experts

My foray into personalized genetic testing

My foray into personalized genetic testing (part two)

My triathlon comeback

Paint-by-numbers medicine (part one)

Part two: 10 epic medical fails you may have fallen for

PhytoGuard: Your 'one-stop-shop' for phytonutrient benefits

Pushing back on the supplement alarmists

Real healthcare reform

Repeat after me: "Hunger is my friend!"

Saving the VA hospitals

Should doctors be role models for their patients?

Spring detox

Stem Cells: Panacea or snake oil?

Supplement of the week: DIM

Tamiflu: Our first-line drug against the flu is an epic-fail

Test your "Health IQ" ? round three!

Test Your Health IQ: Round Five!

Test Your Health IQ: Round four!

The artificial sweetener controversy: who should you believe?

Page  1 2