There's no "one-size-fits-all" diet, according to new research

By Dr. Ronald Hoffman

Are you whipsawed by the conflicting claims for the low-fat, fiber-rich, plant-based diet vs. the high-fat, low-carb, animal protein-based diet? How could BOTH be effective for certain people to optimize their metabolisms and achieve weight loss goals, while leaving others high-and-dry in terms of diet success?

We've seen a lot of diet fads: raw foods, fruititarian, blood-type, Paleo, Macrobiotic, Whole 30, ketogenic-all have their acolytes. Then there are those advocated by government health authorities and the American Heart Association, who basically advise the public to avoid extremes and eat something like a "balanced" Mediterranean or "DASH" diet-high in fiber, moderate in fat, low in sodium. Trouble is, even that mainstream approach is ineffective for some people.

How can we explain this wide variation in responses?

And, moreover, can we develop methods of predicting an individual's unique way of responding to certain foods?

A pair of enterprising Israeli scientists have recently sought to do precisely that. Choosing blood sugar as an easily-quantifiable measure of response to food, Drs. Eran Elinav and Eran Segal of the Weizmann Institute of Science have developed an algorithm which successfully characterizes how people will respond to different meals.

First, they demonstrated (not surprisingly!) that "different strokes for different folks" applies to food responses.

The popular "glycemic index" (GI) is a measure of how quickly specific foods spike blood sugar responses. For example, canned chickpeas have a relatively low GI of 38 compared with fruit roll-ups which have a GI of 99. Trouble is, premium ice cream also has a GI of 38. Which do you think could set you on a path to diabetes faster-chickpeas or ice cream? The answer highlights the obvious inadequacies of the GI for making diet recommendations.

Elinav and Segal report on profound inter-subject variations in blood sugar responses to foods. Meals that caused precipitous rises in blood sugar in one subject produced barely a blip in others. One subject reacted profoundly to bananas; another did not, but instead experienced glucose spikes from cookies.

This observation hearkens back to pioneering clinical ecologist Dr. William Philpott, author of Victory over Diabetes: A Bio-Ecologic Triumph.

Philpott proposed that differences in metabolic responses to foods were allergic in nature-that food reactions impaired the body's handling of certain comestibles, resulting in disparities of carbohydrate disposition.

Philpott even handed out fingerstick glucometers to his patients and invited them to test their blood sugar responses to foods one-by-one. One of his former patients reported to me that she discovered she had an atypical exaggerated response to buckwheat, of all things, and has since steered clear of it.

Elinav and Segal sought to create an algorithm-a mathematical model-that predicts how an individual would respond to a given food. Using 137 factors, including such familiar ones as age, body mass index, and medical history-as well as novel ones, like the characteristics of the bacteria that inhabit the intestine (microbiome), they managed with uncanny precision to reach practical conclusions for averting unhealthy blood sugar rises.

Of interest, the timing of food consumption affected blood sugar responses, even within the same individual. In a single participant, there were different responses depending on whether a food was consumed after sleep vs. after exercise.

The Israeli study is one of the first to account for interperson variations in the microbiome as a major determinant of how foods are metabolized.

With the advent of more accurate genetic testing (nutrigenomics), there promises to be a revolution in nutritional science which will take the guesswork out of planning individual diets for optimizing health and combatting obesity.

Have a comment on this article? Send it.


Back to...

Health conditions and concerns

More in this group...

Vitamin c / atherosclerosis scare

Functional food science

Is your diet making you sick?

Drugs that steal

Iron: deficiency and toxicity

12 drugs you should never take (part 2 of 3)

12 supplements you should NEVER take

"Death by food pyramid": a review

"Don't take your vitamins"? So not!

"Fed Up": A movie review

Intelligent Medicine Bone Health Protocol available now!

Intelligent Medicine Health News Review

10 "Duh!" health and nutrition stories

10 simple hacks to improve your diet

10 ways the foods you eat can affect your sex life

11 reasons why you should be using extra virgin olive oil

11 things worth trying if you suffer from tinnitus

12 drugs you should never take (part 1 of 3)

12 drugs you should never take (part 3 of 3)

12 supplements you should NEVER take

13 tips for surviving the holidays (part one)

13 tips for surviving the holidays (part two)

16 reasons to go nuts for nuts

5 easy Paleo diet hacks

6 new products that I'm excited about in 2015

A nerd in the kitchen: My review of The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science by J. Kenji Lo

American Heart Association doubles down on outmoded saturated fat recommendations

Are "paleo snacks" an oxymoron?

Are fruit and veggie pills really as effective as they claim?

Are fruit and veggie pills really as effective as they claim?

Are vegetarians healthier than meat-eaters? So NOT, according to shocking new studies

Can a low-salt diet actually be BAD for you?

Can what you eat really damage your thyroid?

Clinical Focus: Nicotinamide Riboside

Confessions of an EX-vegan

Could a vegetarian diet undermine your mental health?

Could a vegetarian diet undermine your mental health?

Could Big Sugar become the next Big Tobacco?

Death by Food Pyramid? by Denise Minger: A Review

Defensive Eating: Taming your addiction to food

Detox in a box

Dispatches from the front lines of nutrition-what you need to know about the latest health headlines

Do you have SIBO (Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth)?

Do you really need to eat breakfast?

Frontline gets it wrong about supplements

GMO non-browning apples: A risky solution to a non-problem

Happy one millionth podcast! Let's review the best of 2015 so far

How a raw foods diet can make you sick

ICYMI: Dr. Hoffman's Store now available through Fullscript!

Iron: Do you want to hear the good news or the bad news first?

Is fructose really that bad for you?

Is the "pandemic" of vitamin D deficiency exaggerated?

Is the way to a (wo)man's heart through his(her) stomach?

Is the Whole30 diet right for you? (part one)

Is the Whole30 diet right for you? (part two)

Is your grill killing you? Your personal anti-AGEing program

More good news about olive leaf extract

Organic produce trumps conventional: Here's why!

Paleo pitfalls

Paleo Pitfalls

Pro-vegan website outs apostate meat-eaters

Repeat after me: "Hunger is my friend!"

Rethinking Super Size Me: Is it a Big Whopper?

Rethinking breakfast

Revisiting salt intake - are you eating too much or too little?

Sorry vegans, but humans were designed to eat (some) meat

Supplements that I take

The artificial sweetener controversy: who should you believe?

The Whole30: A review

The WORST health and nutrition stories of 2015

There's no "one-size-fits-all" diet, according to new research

To juice or not to juice?

Top 10 "duh!" health and nutrition stories of 2016

Vitamins can cause cancer-REALLY??

What do Bill Gates, eggs, and soylent green have in common?

What week is it, kiddies? Why, it's National Folic Acid Week!

Why I liberally indulge in high-test chocolate

Why you don't have to feel guilty about those Valentine's Day chocolates

Why you should keep taking your supplements

Will the "real" China study please stand up

Yet more reasons to go gluten-free